Welcome everyone! My art represents what I believe is the next step in the eventualities of graphical evolution... in other words, I believe that I am helping the cause, piece by piece, to break us out of the horrid Window's default graphics world we liv
Ok...I normally avoid ranting and complaining as much as possible, but this has gotten out of hand...

SOMEONE has been attacking my most recent submissions with unusually low ratings... Take, for instance, the last three:

https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?library=8&SkinID=15327
https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?library=8&SkinID=15329
https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?library=8&SkinID=15328

Never have I seen ANY skins rated 1's and 2's right off the bat...And not only that... I really don't believe that these walls deserve such low ratings. Now I'm sorry if what I'm doing annoys some of you, but this annoys me even more. So, here's a request:

ADMINS:
Please take a look into this situation, because I really hate when people take grudges against another user and vent off steam by shoving low ratings down their throats...

SKINNERS:
If you like the walls, please comment. If you have the ability to rate, please rate.

Thanks for anyone who can post replys, I need all the feedback about this issue I can get.
Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Feb 19, 2004
well i for one went through and looked at the aforementioned skins.. macro to be honest, because you desire the honesty, they were moderate skins. they weren't amazing but they definitly were not trash. it looks like you went at the design for DESKTOP in mind, as you should. very relaxed, very light. they have a reason and for that they are the wall papers i would expect to see make it onto a site that boasts pristeige.

if that was the low end of what they were accepting i would understand a 1 or 2 rating. however in the grand scehme of things i've been running across some .. honestly.. absolute junk that has made it on to this site and when i see 'the finest wall paper collection on the internet' i feel.. kinda mislead. i hear that the rating system is being revamped/reconsidered and that being the case i'm suprised they were not given 6's by the moderators as was usual. because in the grand scheme of things, they are mediums. i can see frog boys logic but other admins must have a completly different eye for these things.

the small series of #14, for example (sorry duno how to draw a link to it from in WC browser). i understand the kids' not a pro but we're talking: draw a mess in bryce and hit it with a plastic wrap in photoshop. he's got a fan. that's great. but put it on deviant art, not on the 'best of the net'. i was really hurt to see that made it through moderation. and there are many things like this that do.

yadda yadda what's my point? macro - the ratings at this point are meaningless.. don't be discouraged. but admins - if the bar is going to be raised on the ratings, why not on the submissions altogether?

*braces for impact*
on Feb 19, 2004
here you go..

https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.asp?Library=8&skinid=15320

?
on Feb 19, 2004
here you go..

Well yes indeed .....
Somebody was smoking some bad weed .......
on Feb 19, 2004
Yeah, ok....There is no need to point out the "Really bad ones that Frogboy lets through" Is there?



[Message Edited]
on Feb 19, 2004
China!
on Feb 19, 2004
Yes?
on Feb 20, 2004
Just say it how it is
on Feb 20, 2004




Powered by SkinBrowser!
on Feb 20, 2004
#48 Somebody was smoking some bad weed




i need that lurk emoticon.
on Feb 20, 2004
Walls are ( and this is not verbatim ) 'not a priority


Hope no one is offended by my opinion, but, what good is it to skin everything on your computer and not have a wonderful wallpaper to top it all off? I think the two go hand in hand.
on Feb 20, 2004
*bleh*
on Feb 20, 2004
Bleh bleh
on Feb 20, 2004
Bleh Bleh Bleh



Powered by SkinBrowser!
on Feb 21, 2004
bleh. bleh bleh. bleh bleh bleh. bleh?
on Feb 21, 2004
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5